One of the more highlighted features of the financial crisis is that savings rates have plummeted on savings accounts. Anyone who has diligently saved over the past few years now faces being punished by existing low interest rates for savers. However, now that the threat of financial collapse is receding, savers are reportedly worrying less about how safe their money is, as much as getting decent returns on savings. This is especially important because the volume of savings in the UK has actually gone up, even though many current accounts are paying little interest - with some even paying zero interest. However, there are still options for serious savers to get a decent rate of return on savings.
Firstly, there are still a number of UK accounts which will provide a return of around 4-5%, as recently highlighted in the Telegraph, plus ThisIsMoney lists a number of internet-based savings accounts which offer better savings returns. The problem is, many of these set limits in place for issues such as missed payments or withdrawal frequency, offer decent interest only for a limited period, or else have limited bonuses in place to boost the savings rate. The disappointment is compounded by the fact that building societies used to be more competitive on savings rates, but at present they seem more focused on longer-term savings such as cash ISA savings accounts and eBonds.
The second option is to go offshore - which may raise jitters for some after the crash of Icelandic banks at the end of last year. However, offshore accounts are still generally offering better rates than high street banks, even where the bank owns the offshore savings company. This is actually a key point, because in the case of UK-owned offshore banks at least, the savings are guaranteed by the parent bank. In other words, you're only likely to lose your money if the parent bank goes bust, but as we've seen with RBS and HBOS, any large UK bank will be propped up by the government.
There are a number of interesting comparisons worth checking up if considering going offshore - MoneyFacts and Money.co.uk both offer comparison charts. Unfortunately, the best rates being offered again seem to be bonds - in other words, locking up your savings for a specified number of years. At present international savings may offer better savings rates than high street banks, but are still not as competitive as fixed term savings plans. Additionally, do be careful of risk - I noticed that a number of building societies offering particularly good rates, but do be aware that many of these had their ratings downgraded by Moodys. In the event of these building societies or banks going bust, or being nationalised, you may find yourself experiencing a lot of worry as to whether your money is protected or not.
Overall, the picture for savings remains pretty muted as you'd expect, but there are options available for improving the rate of return. The problem is that it mostly involves locking up savings for a fixed term of up to five years, which is not something savers really should have to consider. Additionally, despite the UK government's presence in the UK banking market via majority stakes in RBS and Lloyds Banking Group, ownership of Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley, they seem more interested in seeing the banks recapitalise, than provide any kind of real service to consumers. The result is that the tax payer hasn't simply paid to rescue these banks, we're also paying to rebuild them.
Content
Options for improved saving interest rates in the UK
Economic optimism foolish
Edmund Conway in the Telegraph claims the recession is over, which is about as outrageously optimistic as you can get.
Much of this unfounded optimism seems focused on the fact that the property market has seen a positive bounce over this spring - mortgage lending is up , buyer enquiries are up , and the DCLG reported a 1.1% rise in house prices over April .
The problem is, spring has always been prime home buying time, so to extrapolate this into some form of economic recovery seems absurd. It really does look like a bounce, which means we should expect economic conditions to get a lot worse towards the winter - as the property market traditionally cools.
In the meantime, other economic indicators are looking increasingly adverse.
We've seen repeated claims that the European banks have not properly written down their losses. In the meantime, Eastern Europe looks like it could crash and drag a lot of Europe down with it through a chain reaction. Latvia is already in big trouble and could be the smoking gun to bring the rest of Eastern Europe down with it, and a number of central European banks with them . And that's before we address the issue of existing write-downs the ECB is already severely worried about.
In the meantime, here in the UK, the whole banking sector continues to reshuffle in order to try and adapt to what still remains a crisis.
RBS is looking to split off business deals it claims as "unprofitable" into a separate group - in the meantime, as if the market hadn't already got itself into trouble creating complex debt instruments, this is exactly what is being proposed to get the UK taxpayer money back from semi-nationalised banks such as the RBS and Lloyds Group.
Among the building societies, the government is looking to allow changes to how they fund themselves in mass markets, in order to stop a repeat of the Dunfermline Building society crash . This is not least because others, not least the West Bromwich Building Society and others are also believed to be on the brink of collapse .
The Nationwide Building Society has already raised its mortgage rates sharply this week , close on the heels of other increases in mortgage rates last month. While the Nationwide remained one of the cheapest mortgage loan providers around, it no longer appears to be trying to outcompete other mortgage lenders.
If anything, the entire financial world still seems to be on a downward
spiral. While the potential collapse of the banking sector appears to
have been averted - certainly for now - the global economic picture is
anything but healthy.
Stay tuned.
Nationwide slammed but still offers better deal than nationa...
It's unfair to see the recent criticism of the Nationwide Building Society's changes to its mortgage rates.
Yes, it's unfortunate that the Nationwide will no longer be putting new borrowers on it's existing Base Mortgage Rate (BMR), currently at 2.5% - but let's face it, the Nationwide has been pushing harder than any other mortgage lender to continue to provide mortgages to the market.
And no other mortgage lender was even coming close to beating Nationwide's BMR.
Despite the fact that the Royal Bank of Scotland, Halifax, Bank of Scotlant, and Loyds TSB, all have direct government support through part-privatisation.
This is not least receiving government money with the aim of improving lending to to mortgage and loans market .
And yet RBS, HBOS, and Lloyds are still charging very uncompetitive rates, as if they are making a particular effort not to lend, and instead just hoard the government's funding.
So it's left to a mutual like the Nationwide Building Society to offer not just the cheapest mortgages, but also the cheapest loans , and even the lowest fees on credit card use.
And then when the Nationwide finally decides it needs to move new customers onto a new higher mortgage rate - one more comparative to rates offered by Barclays and HSBC, and still cheaper than RBS, HBOS or Lloyds, some journalists think this worthy of strong criticism?
Perhaps I'm biased - I have my mortgage with Nationwide, I have a Flexaccount current account with them , and also my credit card (though mostly for going on holiday with).
I used to be a financial advisor for a living so I like to think I can recognise a quality deal, and so far that is exactly what Nationwide have been delivering on - far more than any government-supported bank.
Nationwide have been leading the lending market in trying to allow responsible people to borrow responsibly.
If a small increase in rates on just one of their products for just new borrowers is deserving of such criticism, then I can only wonder why these journalists haven't been more condemning of the lousy rates being offered by traditional high street banks.
When will savings recover?
The Royal Bank of Scotland just announced a staggering £28 billion loss.
While we’ve seen a number of banks declare billions in losses over the past year, and the process still continues, the RBS loss is going down as the biggest corporate loss in UK history .
It’s unbelievable what’s happened to the banks, and what’s even more unfair is that it’s the tax payer who is paying for all the mistakes of the banks .
We’re not just paying in terms of government funding and asset swaps with the Treasury, but also as customers. Interest rates on savings accounts are dead , but mortgage and loan interest rates remain a lot higher than the Bank of England’s base rate.
Which means the banks are doing what they can to widen profit margins to recapitalise themselves, meaning that we’re ending up paying twice to save them from their own greed.
I currently have a Nationwide bank account which is paying less than 1% interest. On the one hand, at least I know Nationwide is one of the stronger financial institutions and isn’t under any threat of being part-nationalised like RBS and Lloyds, and doesn’t look likely to be nationalised any time soon.
Even still, as I’m saving for a deposit on a house, I don’t like the fact that my savings are no longer working as hard as they used to.
Hopefully the banking crisis will soon be over, and perhaps for the sake of the financial system, banks need to widen profit margins in order to bring this to an end sooner, rather than later.
But just don’t expect me to enjoy being part of the bail-out, when all I can see is the cost from it all, rather than the benefits.
How the UK pays for the banks twice
This week’s move by the Bank of England to cut the interest rate to an all time low of 1% is a bad move for all of us, especially those trying to save money.
It is an unfortunate double whammy, because while the tax payer is subsidising the banking system via RBS and Lloyds especially though part nationalisation , plus through government guarantees and debt swaps with its special liquidity scheme , the cut in interest rates especially benefits the banks by increasing their profit margins.
A major way banks make their profit is through arbitrage between savings rates on loan rates. In other words, the bank offers a relatively low interest rate to savers, a relatively higher rate to borrowers, and the difference in between is profit.
The problem is that while savings rates have come down a lot, especially as the Bank of England cuts interest rates, the actual borrowing rates remain comparatively high.
For example, with mortgages, it used to be the case that tracker rates would follow the Bank of England’s rate up and down. If they still did this, then many people would be feeling the benefits.
However, lenders have now instituted a “mortgage tracker rate” which means the tracker rate they offer is a few full percentiles about the Bank of England’s interest rate, but does not necessarily comes down if the Bank of England’s interest rate is cut .
Many previous tracker mortgages also came with a mortgage floor which effectively means that the tracker mortgage will not come down below a certain rate, even if the Bank of England interest rate continues to fall.
Coupling the constant cutting of interest rates on savings, with the artificially high mortgage repayment rates, means that the UK’s banks are cashing in at the detriment to the very consumer’s whose taxes are keeping such banks afloat.
We as a nation are therefore hit by a double whammy of subsidising the UK banks directly through billions in government support, and additionally by the banks ensuring that interest rate cuts actually boost their own profit margins.
Not many people are aware of just how depressingly manipulated we are being used to help support the very institutions, whose greed and maladministration brought us into what appears to be a deep recession, and yet it will be the banks who end up profiting most from it.
